3/9/2023 0 Comments Days gone actor![]() It just seems that they didn’t necessarily bother that particular reviewer quite as much. Even more positive reviews of the game highlighted some of those issues. ![]() Rather than list the many, many reasons that Days Gone reviews were a bit more mixed, it’s enough to say that the average aggregate Days Gone review score suggest that there were problems with the game that went beyond the implication that a significant number of reviewers just didn’t bother to “properly” play the game. Games that share quite a few design similarities with Days Gone (which include PlayStation exclusives Marvel’s Spider-Man and Ghost of Tsushima) also received higher overall review scores from critics. However, slower paced video games like Red Dead Redemption 2, Spiritfarer, Oxenfree, and even something like Animal Crossing: New Horizons (to name a few slightly more recent examples) all garnered better average review scores than Days Gone. However, Witwer is implying that the general nature of video game reviews means that there is a significant enough number of journalists who do not play a game long enough to enjoy a slower game or one that maybe just takes a while to “get good.” Maybe it didn’t happen in the particular instance that Witwer is referencing, but it’s not like it’s impossible such a thing could happen. Is it possible that a reviewer didn’t finish Days Gone and that their negative review of a game was based on the elements of the title they didn’t see? Absolutely. The biggest problems with Witwer’s statements are the generalizations he makes and the way he uses that generalizations to justify a viewpoint that is disproven (or strongly contradicted) by more logical evidence. It’s also obviously fine to disagree with a point that a reviewer does or doesn’t make, especially if you weigh in with a counterpoint of your own. He’s right to not name the critic he’s referring to given that doing so could trigger a harassment campaign, but there’s nothing inherently wrong with disagreeing with a review. You can read the rest of Witwer’s statement here, and you probably should given that his argument is based on experiencing the full context of the thing you’re talking about.Īs some are already pointing out, the problem here isn’t that Witwer is criticizing a critic. I think that’s not only too bad, but misleading to actual audience members who would like to read an actual review of what we actually did.” These journalists rush in, they do NOT take their time, they do NOT play the game on the terms the game presents, because it is their job to put out an article on a deadline. The best story beats and the best game play happen much later in the game, and it’s clear that the nature of game reviews and this slow-burn philosophy of game development are not compatible. “For better or for worse, it was designed for you to take your time. “ Days Gone was always meant to be a slow burn game and story,” Witwer says. Witwer goes on to say that the “slow burn” nature of Days Gone means that it’s the type of game that may not lend itself to game reviews and what he presumes to be the nature of the video game review industry. There were other tells, but it was pretty clear that this reviewer played the game for several hours and then wrote his review. In it, the horde mechanic, the show-stopping center piece of the game, it wasn’t mentioned once. ![]() “I read a review today from a website/publication that will remain nameless. That’s not quiiiite the audience,” Witwer says. “You’re asking me about the review world. John) blamed some of the game’s negative reviews on journalists that didn’t finish the game. ![]() Seriously, if youre gonna be all calm and cool over console wars, then build one unit to appease them all.During a recent Reddit AMA, Days Gone voice actor Sam Witwer (who portrayed Deacon St. Let Sony build the hardware, let Microsoft run the online services, and Nintendo can be over accessories and merchandising. Build one hardware unit and invest in developers, then. is how things are going to go, then call a truce with your competition, build one hardware unit and just make games, after all, hardwares not profitable, right? And that saves consumers spending $500 every five years now instead of having to shell out $1300 with a mad rush against scalpers to get several instead of one. If Sony expected better for Days Gone, they shouldve improved the marketing for the game rather than treating Bend like a third-string developer, thats Sonys fault, while they dumped all their resources into one basket that is Naughty Dog, what do you expect? And who sood better? The poster child, go figure. What, on PC? No, I bought new Sony hardware to play games on Sony hardware, not watch them fold to competing hardware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |